The Employee Free Choice Act is like Nazism?
Last week, the Northwest edition of the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette printed an absurd editorial about the Employee Free Choice Act that somehow made a comparison between the bill and Nazism. You can read the entire editorial here. An excerpt:
“JUST WHEN YOU might have thought the secret ballot was safe when it comes to elections over whether to unionize American workplaces . . . the union bosses are back with a "compromise" that sounds all too much like their original power grab…
BUT THE REAL joker in the deck is the provision in the bill that would have a federal arbitrator set the terms of the next contract between management and a new union if they can't come to terms within 90 days. This clause would of course stiffen the union's demands and maybe management's resistance to them, too. Why negotiate in good faith when a government official is going to decide the contract anyway?...
Have you noticed? Political parties supposedly dedicated to the workers' welfare have a way of undermining their rights. They may begin by bullying management but wind up dictating to labor, too. And everybody else. For a European example to beware, note the sad history of the grandly named National Socialist German Workers Party, aka Nazis.”
You can set the record straight by responding to this outrageous editorial here. Some key points to mention, particularly in regards to their attack on first contract arbitration:
• Stalling on contract negotiations is a tactic routinely used by companies NOT UNIONS to prevent workers from reaching an agreement, even after they have opted to join a union
• Currently, 52% of workers do not have a contract one year after forming a union and 37% of workers still do not have a contract after two years

